Inside the deal that nearly fell apart — twice
For six days the negotiations were declared dead. What kept them alive says more about the moment than the text itself.
For six days the negotiations were declared dead. What kept them alive says more about the moment than the text itself.
It is not a strike and it is not a slogan. It is a slow renegotiation, one resignation letter at a time.
Away from the cameras, a handful of envoys are redrawing lines that armies could not.
The labor market is doing two contradictory things at once, and both are true.
Tens of thousands converged on the capital on Thursday, a show of force on the eve of a measure that could reshape the decade.
Neither side can point to a lead outside the margin of error, and both are behaving as if they can.
We have built a culture that rewards the fast answer. The important questions rarely have one.
A single line in a policy statement undid a week of losses. The calm may not outlast the sentence.
Latest
Quotation of the Day
“You cannot legislate trust back into a system. You can only earn it, slowly and in public — which is exactly what nobody in this room seems to have the patience for.”
a delegate to the talks, on the agreement that nearly collapsed.
Read the story ›A play written for another decade turns out to have been waiting for this one.
The instrument was built to answer one question. It is the second, unasked one that has scientists talking.
The people who keep a city running increasingly cannot afford to live in it. The math is finally catching up.
Institutions do not defend themselves. They are only as durable as the ordinary habits that sustain them.
The argument was technical. The stakes, several of the justices acknowledged, are anything but.
Funding has not kept pace with need, and the first frost is already on the tents.
Lawmakers are drafting the rulebook for a game whose pieces keep changing shape.
Each season now arrives asking the same question: how much of this can be planned for?
The people who keep a city running increasingly cannot afford to live in it. The math is finally catching up.
Institutions do not defend themselves. They are only as durable as the ordinary habits that sustain them.
The most revealing thing about the new tools is not their answers, but the questions we bring to them.
Essential turned out to be a word we used loudly in a crisis and quietly forgot afterward.
“Your columnist is right that we reward speed over judgment. But institutions relearn patience only when their leaders model it — and lately few do.”
“I have driven a bus in this city for nineteen years. We were called essential exactly until the emergency ended, and not a day longer.”
“The new tools are genuinely impressive. The judgment they cannot supply is the only part of the job that ever mattered.”
“Quiet diplomacy works precisely because it is quiet. We should stop demanding that it perform for the cameras.”
More in Opinion
From the Editorial Board
Our view on the week: institutions endure not by decree but by the ordinary, unglamorous work of keeping faith with them.
The people who keep a city running increasingly cannot afford to live in it. The math is finally catching up.
A container’s route now tracks politics as closely as it tracks demand.
The labor market is doing two contradictory things at once, and both are true.
A record week for renewables raises the harder question of what happens when the wind drops.
Seen together for the first time, the late work forces a reappraisal of everything that came before.
A play written for another decade turns out to have been waiting for this one.
It is being called a masterpiece and a fraud, sometimes in the same review.
Subscribe to The Chronicle